Re: Re ld,ad,(h)d & tlc (fwd)

[Eric Crump <wleric@showme.missouri.edu>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 10 May 1997 16:24:37 -0500 (CDT)
From: Eric Crump <wleric@SHOWME.MISSOURI.EDU>
To: Moderated WCENTER <wcentr-l@lists.missouri.edu>
Subject: Re: Re ld,ad,(h)d & tlc (fwd)

From: wtgcenter@vax1.bemidji.msus.edu (Writing Resource Center)

>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 13:02:50 -0500
>From: Stephen Newmann <newmann@msmary.edu>
>
>I suspect Christy was feeling the stress of the end-o-the-term crunch and
>needed to kick a dawg. 

I don't kick dawgs (sp) dogs. John was dlibrately trying to provok a rspons
and I gav him on.  And I do make lots of rrors myslf so I know I'm not on
to throw stones.  I am your "worst critic" though-I am not a profssional yt,
I probably can't do it right myslf, but I xpct more from him bcaus h claims
h is. Go ahad guys....find some more rrors I dare you!
lctronic mail is nic bcaus you don't have to proof-rad things to dath
and that IS on of the frdoms.  By the way I am having som difficulty
with my kyboard.  I bt you thought on lttr wouldn't mak a diffnce.

                           Christy
>


>On Thu, 8 May 1997, Hatton-Montoya, Sharon wrote:
>
>>
>> I must admit that I was a bit surprised to Christy's response to the english
>> instructor.  One of the things I have enjoyed most about this list is the
>> willingness by the subcribers to help each other in a very non-judgmental
>> way.  I must agree with Dr. Phillabaum's comments because I, too, was under
>> the impression that most e-mail is informal, and I don't really proofread
>> mine very often.  I think the sharing of ideas is much more imortant than a
>> few errors.  Sharon
>>