Re: Food & Writing

["Frank Sherwood" <FSHERWOO@Hermes.GC.PeachNet.EDU>]

Of course, I guess food and writing are both habitual, at least to a 
writer, and to be good at either, maybe even obsessional, or at least 
undoubtful a little; alcohol and smoking traditionally have been 
associated with writing or nurturing.  I think it's a sort of 
fidgety, concentrating synthesis--a hard straddle, right?--but 
probably it really is deep in consciousness for the self concept to 
be reduced to squiggly symbols or meanings thereof.  To create:  is a 
good habit then simply good?   Can we be good without being habitual?
writing seems to me in some basic way varietous at bottom and food 
nurturing, giving identity to that tethered/untethering.  Or maybe 
it's identitous, the sireny, finessey music of any habit, work, or 
freedom.  Can one really be good at food?     And what would good at 
writing mean?  Is there any difference between habit and identity?
To be a habit or not to be ...  young 

and raw / like the wind outloud on the water.