[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Replies to posts

To: wcenter@unicorn.acs.ttu.edu
Subject: Re: Replies to posts
From: Wendy Wagner <NY932263@PACEVM.DAC.PACE.EDU>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 94 20:11:07 EST
In-Reply-To: Message of Wed, 14 Dec 1994 16:23:45 -0600 from <skrause@bgnet.bgsu.edu>

Mr. Prime Number (aka Steve Krause),
    First, how is my stance (supporting a change in the list processing
program) exclusionary? How is wanting people who are asking for syllabi to
take the time and energy to send these posts privately exclusionary?
   Second, you wrote: "And if your system is being stretched to the point of
breaking because you have 60 email messages a day, then there is something much
more seriously wrong than being underfunded." First, I received 135 messages
in one day last week. Second, perhaps you will explain your comment that there
"is something much more seriously wrong than being underfunded." What exactly
do you think is wrong? Be sure to answer in words of one syllable, because I
am not sure my "system" can handle anything more complicated.

The Lowest Common Denominator (aka Wendy Wagner)

Follow-Ups:
- As usual,
  - From: Katie Fischer <kfischer@keller.clarke.edu>
- Re: Replies to posts
  - From: Steve Krause <skrause@bgnet.bgsu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: censorship
Next by Date: I always have enjoyed
Prev by thread: RE: Replies to posts
Next by thread: As usual,
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread